´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ ÀüÀÚÀú³Î

´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ

25±Ç 3È£ (2017³â 9¿ù)

¿µ¾î ¼ö¾÷ ÄÁ¼³Æà °üÁ¡¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸: ÄÚÆÛ½º ºÐ¼®À» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î

±è³ªÀ¯ & ÀÌÈñö

Pages : 93-112

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24303/lakdoi.2017.25.3.93

PDFº¸±â

¸®½ºÆ®

Abstract

Kim, Nayu & Lee, Heechul. (2017). The viewpoint of consulting English class based on corpus analysis. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 25(3), 93-112. The aim of this study was to research English class consultants points of view by analyzing corpus data from cases of English classes. To investigate it, this study conducted quantitative research by analyzing corpus data from 103 reports (30,953 tokens, 8,922 types) written by consultants who had monitored English classes, and qualitative one by reviewing thirteen cases from each report. This research found that the consultants focused more on students behavior and activity than teachers one, and paid more attention to the aim of the class rather than students learning strategies on process of whole class. Moreover, the consultants placed much value on students learning motivation, and gave students confidence and will of participating in class much weight. In addition, time management was regarded as a significant component in organizing class by the consultants. On the dimension of four skills activities, the consultants presented specific improvement of reading instruction, but introduced vague and abstract direction of speaking and writing instruction to the teachers. The findings of this research imply that the viewpoint of consulting class needs more to include teachers behavior, students strategies, flexibility of time management and specific ways to innovate speaking and writing instruction.

Keywords

# Á¦ 2¾ð¾î ½Àµæ(second language acquisition) # ¿µ¾î ¼ö¾÷ ÄÁ¼³ÆÃ(English teaching consultation) # ÄÚÆÛ½º ºÐ¼®(corpus analysis) # »ç·Ê¿¬±¸(case study)

References

  • ±Ç´ö¿ø. (2007). À½¾Ç ±³°ú ¼ö¾÷ ÄÁ¼³Æà ¿¬±¸. Çб³ ÄÁ¼³Æðú ¼ö¾÷ÄÁ¼³ÆÃÀÇ °úÁ¦¿Í Àü¸Á. °æÀα³À°´ëÇб³ »êÇÐÇù·Â´Ü․¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Çб³ ÄÁ¼³Æà ¿¬±¸È¸ °øµ¿ ¼¼¹Ì³ª ÀÚ·áÁý.
  • ±èÀοÁ. (2013). ±×·ì±â¹Ý ¼ö¾÷ ÄÁ¼³ÆÃÀÌ Ãʵºñ±³»çÀÇ ¿µ¾î ¼ö¾÷ ¿ª·®¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ. ¿µ¾î±³À°, 68(2), 131-151.
  • ±èÁ¾ÈÆ. (2012). ¿µ¾î ¼ö¾÷ ÄÁ¼³Æÿ¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿µ¾î±³»çÀÇ ÀÎ½Ä °íÂû. ¿µ¾î¿µ¹®ÇÐ, 17(3), 203-231.
  • ±èÇý·Ã, ¹Ú¾à¿ì. (2010). ÃÊµî ¿¹ºñ±³»ç ¿µ¾î¼ö¾÷ ÄÁ¼³Æà Àû¿ë ¿¬±¸. Ãʵ¾î±³À°, 16(1), 31-63.
  • ±èÇý·Ã, ºÎ°æ¼ø. (2007). Ãʵ¾î ¼ö¾÷ÄÁ¼³Æà Àû¿ë ¿¬±¸. Ãʵ¾î±³À°, 13(2), 33-64.
  • ¼³±ÔÁÖ. (2007). »çȸ°ú ¼ö¾÷ ÄÁ¼³Æà ¸ðÇü °³¹ß. Çб³ ÄÁ¼³Æðú ¼ö¾÷ÄÁ¼³ÆÃÀÇ °úÁ¦¿Í Àü¸Á. °æÀα³À°´ëÇб³ »êÇÐÇù·Â´Ü․¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Çб³ ÄÁ¼³Æà ¿¬±¸È¸ °øµ¿ ¼¼¹Ì³ª ÀÚ·áÁý.
  • ÀÌ»ó¼ö, °­Á¤Âù, ÀÌÀ¯³ª, ¿À¿µ¹ü. (2015). ü°èÀû ¼ö¾÷ ºÐ¼®À» À§ÇÑ ¼ö¾÷ ÄÁ¼³ÆÃ. ¼­¿ï: ÇÐÁö»ç, 115-132.
  • ÀÌ»ó¼ö, ÀÌÀ¯³ª, ¸®¸®. (2008). ÁÁÀº ¼ö¾÷¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇÑ․Áß °íµîÇб³ ±³»çÀÇ ÇлýÀÇ Àνĺñ±³ ¿¬±¸. ºñ±³±³À°¿¬±¸, 18(3), 27-47.
  • ÀÌ¿ë¼÷. (2007). ¼ö¾÷ÄÁ¼³ÆÃÀÇ ¹æÇâ. ¿­¸°±³À°½ÇÇ࿬±¸, 10. 3-30.
  • ÀÌÈ­Áø, ¿À»óö, È«¼±ÁÖ. (2006). ¼ö¾÷ÄÁ¼³Æà Áö¿ø ¹× È°¼ºÈ­ ¹æ¾È-¹®Á¦Á¡, ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ Áö¿ø, Á¤Ã¥ Á¦¾ðÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î. ¿­¸°±³À°½ÇÇ࿬±¸, 10. 33-63.
  • Àå°æ¼÷, ¹Îº´¼ö, ÃÖº¸À±. (2013). ÃÊ․Áßµî ¿µ¾î ±³°ú ¼ö¾÷ÄÁ¼³Æÿ¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÎ½Ä ¿¬±¸. ¿Ü±¹¾î±³À°, 20(4), 315-341.
  • Àå°æ¼÷, ÇÑÀº¹Ì. (2007). ¸àÅ丵À» ÅëÇÑ ÃÊÀÓ±³»ç ¿µ¾î¼ö¾÷´É·Â ½ÅÀå: ½ºÅ丮ÅÚ¸µÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î. Ãʵ¾î±³À°, 13(2), 65-96.
  • Áøµ¿¼·, ȫâ³², ±èµµ±â. (2011). Çб³°æ¿µÄÁ¼³Æðú ¼ö¾÷ÄÁ¼³ÆÃ. °æ±â: ±³À°°úÇлç, 87-102.
  • Andersen, P. A. (1999). Nonverbal communication: Forms and functions. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing.
  • Borich, G. D. (2011). Observation skills for effective teaching (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2009). The Systematic Design of Instruction (7th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.
  • Hills, S. B., Naegle, N., & Bartkus, K. (2009). How important are items on a student evaluation? A study of item salience. Journal of Education for Business, 84(5), 297-303.
  • Keller, J. M. (2006). Motivation and performance. Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology, 2, 82-92.
  • Kim, Jee Won., & Rhee, Seok-Chae. (2014). A corpus-based study on Korean EFL learners¡¯ use of resultive conjunctive adverbials. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 22(4), 143-161.
  • Seiler, W. J., & Beall, M, L. (2005). Communication: Making connections (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
  • Shim, Jaewoo., Lee, Heechul., & Jin, Seunghee. (2016). A study on the relationship between self-efficacy belief and beliefs and comprehension in English reading. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 24(4), 129-149.