´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ ÀüÀÚÀú³Î

´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ

30±Ç 4È£ (2022³â 12¿ù)

Á¶À½°ú ûÃë¿¡ ±Ù°ÅÇÑ ¼ö¾÷À» ÅëÇÑ Çѱ¹ÀÎ ´ëÇлýÀÇ ¿µ¾î¸ðÀ½ ¹ßÀ½ º¯È­

°­ÈñÁ¶

Pages : 1-18

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24303/lakdoi.2022.30.4.1

PDFº¸±â

¸®½ºÆ®

Abstract

Kang, Hijo. (2022). A study of English vowel pronunciation by Korean university students with articulatory and auditory training. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 30(4), 1-18. This study tested whether the pronunciation of English vowels could improve through the explicit instruction based on the articulatory and auditory characteristics of English vowels, even during the pandemic, when oral practice was restricted. 30 university students who took an English pronunciation course participated in the study as the experimental group and they were taught English vowels with articulatory and auditory training. The 21 students in the control group listened to target sentences recorded by a native English speaker in an English listening and speaking course. At the beginning and at the end of the semester, the participants in both groups recorded 18 English sentences, four of which ([i], [ɪ], [ɛ], and [©¡]) were acoustically analyzed. As Korean learners of English are known to have difficulties distinguishing those front vowels ([i] vs. [ɪ] and [ɛ] vs. [©¡]), the F1 differences in each of those vowel pairs were statistically analyzed. The results showed that only female students belonging to the experimental group marked a marginally meaningful improvement in the vowel pair of [ɛ] and [©¡]. The author concludes that it is possible to partially enhance the English vowel pronunciations of Korean students through implicit listening and explicit articulatory training. Teaching methods to improve students pronunciation are suggested.

Keywords

# Á¶À½(articulation) # ûÃë(listening) # ¿µ¾î Àü¼³¸ðÀ½(English front vowels) # ¹ßÀ½(pronunciation) # Çѱ¹ÀÎ ´ëÇлý(Korean university students)

References

  • ±èÁö¿¬. (2021). ¸í½ÃÀû ¿µ¾î ¹ßÀ½ ±³À°ÀÌ ´ëÇлý ÇнÀÀÚÀÇ ¹ßÀ½ ´É·Â Çâ»ó¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ ¿¬±¸. ¿µ¾î¿µ¹®Çבּ¸, 47(2), 205-232.
  • ±èÁöÀº. (2007). Çѱ¹ÀÎÀÇ ¿µ¾î Àü¼³ ¸ðÀ½ ¹ßÀ½°ú ¹ßÀ½ ±³À°¿¡ ´ëÇÑ À½¼ºÇÐÀû ¿¬±¸. ¾ð¾îÇÐ, 15(4), 41-54.
  • ±èÁöÀº. (2017). Çѱ¹ÀÎ ÇнÀÀÚ ¿µ¾î ¸ðÀ½ ¹ßÈ­ÀÇ À½¼ºÇÐÀû Â÷ÀÌ¿Í ¹ßÀ½ ÀÌÇصµ, ¸»Çϱâ Á¡¼ö¿ÍÀÇ °ü°è. ¸»¼Ò¸®¿Í À½¼º°úÇÐ, 9(2), 1-7.
  • ¾çº´°ï. (2010). ´ëÇлýµéÀÇ ¿µ¾î¸ðÀ½ ¹ßÀ½°ú Áö°¢. ¿µ¾î±³À°¿¬±¸, 22(4), 165-184.
  • ¾çº´°ï. (2015). ´ëÇлýµéÀÇ ¿µ¾î¸ðÀ½ ÇнÀ ÀüÈÄÀÇ ¹ßÈ­¿Í Áö°¢. ¸»¼Ò¸®¿Í À½¼º°úÇÐ,7(3), 79-88.
  • ÀÌÁÖ°æ, ÀÌ¿¬¿ì. (2011). Çѱ¹ÀÎ ¿µ¾î ÇнÀÀÚ¿Í ¿ø¾î¹ÎÀÇ ±äÀå ¹× ÀÌ¿Ï ¸ðÀ½ ¹ßÈ­ÀÌÇصµ: °í¸ðÀ½À» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î. À½¼ºÀ½¿îÇüÅ·п¬±¸, 17(3), 497-520.
  • Á¶¿¹·Ï. (2022). Çѱ¹ÀÎ ¿µ¾î ÇнÀÀÚÀÇ /©¡, ɛ/¿Í ¹Ì±¹ÀÎ Çѱ¹¾î ÇнÀÀÚÀÇ /¤À, ¤Ä/ÀÇ »êÃâ°ú ÀÎÁö. Àü³²´ëÇб³ ¼®»çÇÐÀ§³í¹®.
  • Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2021). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 6.2).
  • Carr, P. (2013). English phonetics and phonology: An introduction (2nd ed.). Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
  • Cook, A. (2017). American Accent Training. New York: Barron¡¯s.
  • Crystal, T. H., & House, A. S. (1988). The duration of American-English vowels: An overview. Journal of Phonetics, 16, 263-284.
  • Dale, P., & Poms, L. (2005). English pronunciation made simple. New York: Pearson Education.
  • Flege, J. E. (1986). The production and perception of foreign language speech sounds. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Human communication and its disorders (pp. 224-401). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
  • Flege, J. E. (1991). Perception and production: The relevance of phonetic input to L2 language phonological learning. In C. Ferguson & T. Heubner (Eds.), Crosscurrents in second language acquisition and linguistic theories (pp. 249-290). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language speech research (pp. 233-272). Timonium, MD: York Press.
  • Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R. A. (1995). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(5), 3125-3134.
  • Flege, J. E., Ocke-Schwen, B., & Jang, S. (1997). Effects of experience on nonnative speakers¡¯ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437-470.
  • Fridland, V., Kendall, T., & Farrington, C. (2014). Durational and spectral differences in American English vowels: Dialect variation within and across regions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 136(1), 341-349.
  • Giegerich. H. J. (1992). English phonology: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Han, J., Choi, T., Lim, I., & Lee, J. (2011). The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit for Korean learners of English: Perception of English front vowels. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 11(2), 385-413.
  • Hillenbrand, J., & Clark, M. J. (2000). Some effect of duration on vowel recognition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108(6), 3013-3022.
  • Hillenbrand, J., Getty, L. A., Clark, M. J., & Wheeler, K. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(5), 3099-3111.
  • Lee, S., & Rhee, S. (2019). The relationship between vowel production and proficiency levels in L2 English produced by Korean EFL learners. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 11(2), 1-13.
  • Leung, K. K., Jongman, A., Wang, Y., & Sereno, J. A. (2016). Acoustic characteristics of clearly spoken English tense and lax vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 140(1), 45-58.
  • Mojsin, L. (2016). Mastering the American accent (2nd ed.). New York: Barron¡¯s.
  • Ogden, R. (2017). An introduction to English phonetics (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • O¡¯Grady, W., Archibald, J., Aronoff, M., & Rees-Miller, J. (2010). Contemporary linguistics (6th ed.). Boston: Bedford/St.Martins.
  • Oh, E. (2019). The relationship between ¡°native-like¡± L2 vowel production and perceptual judgments enhancement by native listeners. Linguistic Research, 36(2), 241-261.
  • Peterson, G. E., & Barney, H. L. (1952). Control methods used in a study of the vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24(2), 175-184.
  • Piske, T., MacKay, I. R. A., & Flege, J. E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191-215.
  • R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (version 4.1.0).
  • Sheppard. C. (2008). The effect of the acoustic properties of second language vowel production on pronunciation evaluation. In Proceedings of the 2nd ISCA Workshop on Experimental Linguistics, 201-204.
  • Yang, B. (1996). A comparative study of American English and Korean vowels produced by male and female speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 24(2), 245-261.
  • Yang, B . (2010). Formant trajectories of English high tense and lax vowels produced by Korean and American speakers. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 35(2), 407-423.
  • Yang, B . (2020). An evaluation of Korean students¡¯ pronunciation of an English passage by a speech recognition application and two human raters. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 12(4), 19-25.
  • Yang, B . (2022). Speech recognition rates and acoustic analyses of English vowels produced by Korean students. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 14(2), 11-17.
  • Yavaş, M. (2020). Applied English phonology (4th ed.). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.