대한언어학회 전자저널

Cho, Young Ah. (2018). The effects of differential grammar learning tasks on L2 learners' grammatical knowledge and their beliefs about grammar instruction. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 26(3), 1-23. The current study explores the effects of three different types of grammar learning on learners' grammar development and their beliefs about grammar instruction. The three types of grammar learning were the deductive, inductive, and PACE approaches. The participants consisted of 95 Korean College students, and they were assigned to one of those three groups. The study employed a background questionnaire, pre-, post-, and delayed grammar tests, and pre- and post-questionnaires about the learners' beliefs regarding grammar instruction. The findings revealed that the PACE group's performance was greater than any other group in terms of both short- and long-term retention, and the differences between the deductive and inductive groups were seen in the immediate learning process. This study also employed a Learners' Beliefs about Grammar Instrument (LBGI), which showed that the PACE approach had a significantly positive effect on learners' grammar acquisition. Pedagogical implications and suggestions for L2 grammar instruction have been made in the study.

# deduction # induction # PACE # learners' beliefs # L2 grammar acquisition

• Adair-Hauck, B. (1993). A descriptive analysis of whole language/guided participatory versus explicit teaching strategies in foreign language instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
• Adair-Hauck, B. (2007). The PACE model: A dialogic and co-constructive approach to grammar explanation. Paper presented at the New Jersey state foreign language teachers consortium, Princeton, NJ.
• Adair-Hauck, B., & Donato, R. (2002). The PACE model: A story-based approach to meaning and form for standards-based language learning. The French Review, 76(2), 278-296.
• Adair-Hauck, B., & Donato, R. (2010). Using a story-based approach to teach grammar. In E. Glisan & J. Schrum (Eds.), Teacher's handbook, contextualized language instruction (pp. 216-244). Boston: Heinle Cengage Learning.
• Bandar, F., & Gorjian, B. (2017). Teaching grammar to EFL learners through focusing on form and meaning. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Learning, 3(4), 88-96.
• Bernat, E., & Gvozdenko, I. (2005). Beliefs about language learning: Current knowledge, pedagogical implications, and new research directions. TESL-EJ, 9(1), 1-21.
• Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in grammar teaching: A literature review. Language Awareness, 12(22), 96-108.
• Chametzky, B. (2014). PACE your class for good classroom behavior management. Scholars Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(5), 774-778.
• Dekeyser, R. M. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(3), 379-410.
• Donato, R., & Adair-Hauck, B. (1992). Discourse perspectives on formal instruction. Language Awareness, 1(2), 73-89.
• Donato, R., & Adair-Hauck, B. (1994). PACE: A model to focus on form. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American council on the teaching foreign languages, San Antonio, TX.
• Donato, R., & Adair-Hauck, B. (2016). PACE: A story-based approach for dialogic inquiry about form and meaning. In J. Shrum & E. Glisan (Eds.), Teachers; handbook: Contextualized foreign language instruction (5th ed.) (pp. 206-230). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
• Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Erlam, R. (2003). The effects of deductive and inductive instruction on the acquisition of direct object pronouns in French as a second language. Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 242-240.
• Fernάndez, C. (2011). Approaches to grammar instruction in teaching materials: A student in current L2 beginning-level Spanish textbooks. Hispania, 94(1), 155-170.
• Gabillon, Z. (2005). Learners' beliefs: An overview. Journal of Language and Learning, 3(2), 233-260.
• Grammar choice intermediate 1. (2017). Seoul: YBM solution.
• Grammar choice advanced 2. (2017). Seoul: YBM solution.
• Groeneveld, A. (2011). Adjective or adverb? Teaching grammar with the PACE model. Jaargang, 12(3), 24-31.
• Grotjahn, R. (1991). The research programme: Subjective theories. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(2), 187-214.
• Haight, C. E., Herron, C., & Cole, S. P. (2007). The effects of deductive and guided inductive instructional approaches on the learning of grammar in the elementary foreign language college classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 40(2), 288-310.
• Herron, C., & Tomasello, M. (1992). Acquiring grammatical structures by guided instruction. The French Review, 65(5), 708-718.
• Horwitz, E. K. (1988). The beliefs about language learning of beginning foreign language students. Modern Language Journal, 72(3), 283-294.
• Horwitz, E. K. (1999). Cultural and situational influences on foreign language learners' beliefs about language learning: A review of BALLI studies. System, 27, 557-576.
• Ji, H.-J. (2017). Effects of explicit and PACE teaching methods on English relative pronoun learning and attitudes for Korean middle school students. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
• Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education. New York: Routledge.
• Lin, M. H. (2007). The effects of the inductive and deductive approaches on elementary school students' English grammar acquisition. Unpublished master's thesis, National Chengchi University, Taiwan.
• Loewen, S., Li, S., Fei, F., Thompson, A., Nakatsukasa, K., Ahn, A., & Chen, X. (2009). Second language learners' beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 91-104.
• Ma, J.-H., & Cho, Y.-A. (2016). Korean college students' beliefs and speaking strategy use in L2 English learning. The Mirae Journal of English Language and Literature, 21(4), 343-366.
• Mohammed, A. M. (1993). Towards a learner-centered technique of teaching grammar. Language Learning Journal, 7(1), 59-63.
• Mohammed, A. M., & Jaber, H. A. (2008). The effects of deductive and inductive approaches of teaching on Jordanian university students' use of the active and passive voice in English. College Student Journal, 42(2), 545-553.
• Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2011). Teaching grammar in second language classroom. London: Routledge.
• Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Does type of instruction make difference? Substantive findings from a meta-analytic review. Language Learning, 51(1), 157-213.
• Nunan, D. (2005). Practical English language teaching: Grammar. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
• Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.
• Paesani, K. (2005). Literary text and grammar instruction: Revisiting the inductive presentation. Foreign Language Annals, 40(2), 288-310.
• Pudelek, J. (2016). The effectiveness of a guided inductive approach to teaching English grammar: First and second conditionals. Bulletin, 9, 77-91.
• Richard, J. C., Platt, J., & Platt, H. (1992). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Pearson Education Limited, Horlow.
• Ruin, I. (1996). Grammar and the advanced learner: On learning and teaching a second language. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
• Schulz, R. A. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA-Colombia. The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 244-258.
• Shaffer, C. (1989). A comparison of inductive and deductive approaches to teaching foreign languages. Modern Language Journal, 73(4), 395-403.
• Seung, K. W. (2006). Notting hill. Seoul: Screen English Publishing.
• Swaffar, J. K., & Woodruff, M. S. (1978). Language for comprehension: Focus on reading: A report on the University of Texas German program. The Modern Language Journal, 60(1-2). 27-32.
• Tode, T. (2007). Durability problems with explicit instruction in an EFL context: the learning of the English copula 'be' before and after the introduction of the auxiliary 'be'. Language Teaching Research, 11(1), 11-30.
• Viakinnou-Brinson, L., Herron, C., Cole, S. P., & Haight, C. (2012). The effect of target language and code-switching on the grammatical performance and perceptions of elementary-level college French students. Foreign Language Annals, 45(1), 72-91.
• Victori, M., & Lockhart, W. (1995). Enhancing metacognition in self-directed language learning. System, 23(2), 223-234.
• Vogel, S., Herron, C., Cole, S. P., & York, H. (2011). Effectiveness of a guided inductive versus a deductive approach on the learning of grammar in the intermediate-level college French classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 44(2), 353-380.
• Wang, P.-L. (2012). Teaching and learning English verb tenses in a Taiwanese university. English Linguistics Research, 1(1), 18-34.
• Yang, D. (1999). The relationship between EFL learners' beliefs and learning strategy. System, 27, 515-535.