´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ ÀüÀÚÀú³Î

´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ

26±Ç 1È£ (2018³â 3¿ù)

Çѱ¹ ´ëÇлýµéÀÌ ¿µ¾îÀбâ¼ö¾÷¿¡¼­ »ç¿ëÇÏ´Â ¿µ¾îÇнÀÀü·«°ú ÀÚ±âÈ¿´É°¨¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸

ÀºÈ£À±

Pages : 199-218

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24303/lakdoi.2018.26.1.199

PDFº¸±â

¸®½ºÆ®

Abstract

Eun, Hoyoon. (2018). A study of learning strategies and self-efficacy of university learners in Korea in English reading course. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 26(1), 199-218. The goal of this study is to investigate the learning strategies of university students in English reading course and their self-efficacy, based on their English reading proficiency. Three learning strategy factors (Cognitive, Global reading and Memory strategies) and three self-efficacy factors(Self-confidence, Self-control and Task- difficulty) were selected for this study. Opinion questionnaires from 178 university students who took English reading course in Jeonbuk province were collected for this study. The data was analyzed with SPSS 18.0. The results revealed that the preferred learning strategy was Global reading strategy. Next, students of intermediate level used the most various strategies, and the correlation between students learning strategies and their self-efficacy appeared normal. Third, Global reading strategy influenced three factors of self-efficacy the most. The suggestion for future research is that teaching methods to improve a variety of learning strategies and promote stable self-efficacy should be developed.

Keywords

# ¿µ¾îÀбâ(English reading) # ÇнÀÀü·«(learning strategies) # ÀÚ±âÈ¿´É°¨(self-efficacy)

References

  • ±èº¸¹Î. (2016). ¿µ¾î ÀÚ±âÈ¿´É°¨°ú ¿µ¾î´É·Â, ÇнÀµ¿±â ¹× ºÒ¾È°¨ »çÀÌÀÇ °ü°è. ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ±³À°´ëÇпø ¼®»çÇÐÀ§ ³í¹®.
  • ±è¾Æ¿µ, ¹ÚÀοµ. (2001). Çо÷Àû ÀÚ±âÈ¿´É°¨ ôµµ °³¹ß ¹× Ÿ´çÈ­ ¿¬±¸. Çѱ¹±³À°ÇÐ, 39(1), 95-123.
  • ³ª°æÈñ. (2008). Çѱ¹ ´ëÇлýµéÀÇ ¿µ¾îµ¶ÇØÀü·« È°¿ë ¹× È°¿ë¿¡ µû¸¥ µ¶ÇØ´É·ÂÀÇ »ó°ü °ü°èºÐ¼®. Çö´ë¿µ¾î¿µ¹®ÇÐ, 52(2), 91-114.
  • ¹ÚÀº. (2016). »óÈ£Àû Àбâ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ÀбâÀü·« »óÀ§ÀÎÁö, ÀбâÀÌÇØ ¹× ¾îÈÖÇнÀ¿¡ÀÇ È¿°ú. ±³¿ø±³À°, 32(2), 67-88.
  • ¼ÛÁö¿µ. (2017). Çѱ¹´ëÇлýÀÇ ¿µ¾îÀб⡤µè±â´É·Â°ú ÇнÀÀÚ º¯ÀÎ: ÇнÀµ¿±â, ÇнÀÀü·«, ÀÚ±âÈ¿´É°¨À» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î. Àü³²´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø ¹Ú»çÇÐÀ§ ³í¹®.
  • ¿ÀÈñÁ¤. (2012). ÀÚ±âÈ¿´É°¨°ú ÅäÀÍ ¼ºÃëµµÀÇ °ü°è. ¿µ¾î±³À°¿¬±¸, 24(3), 299-319.
  • À̱ÝÈñ. (1998). Çѱ¹ °íµîÇлýÀÇ ¿µ¾îÀбâ°úÁ¤ ¸ðÇü°ú µ¶ÇØÀü·« »ç¿ë ¹× Àбâ´É·Â °£ÀÇ °ü°è. ¼÷¸í¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ¹Ú»çÇÐÀ§ ³í¹®.
  • ÀÌ¸í¼±. (2008). µ¶ÇØ Àü·«Áöµµ°¡ °íµîÇб³ ¿µ¾îÇнÀÀÚµéÀÇ Àб⿡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ. ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ±³À°´ëÇпø ¼®»çÇÐÀ§ ³í¹®.
  • À̸íÀÚ, ¼Û¿µ¸í. (2005). ÀÚ±âÁ¶ÀýÇнÀÀü·«, ÀÚ±âÈ¿´É°¨ ¹× Çо÷¼ºÃëµµ ¼öÁØ¿¡ µû¸¥ Çо÷Àû µ¿±â¿Í ÀÚ±âÆò°¡ÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ. ÁߵÀ°¿¬±¸, 53(1), 85-104.
  • ÀåÈñÁ¤. (2005). ü¹ú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½Å³ä ¾çÀ°½ºÆ®·¹½º°¡ ü¹úÇൿÀ» ¸Å°³·Î ¾Æµ¿ ºÎÀûÀÀ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ: ¾çÀ° È¿´É°¨ ÁßÀçÈ¿°ú¸¦ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î. Çѱ¹½É¸®ÇÐȸÁö, 18(3), 143-163.
  • Á¶¿µ¾Æ, ÃÖÈÆ. (2012). ¿µ¾î Àбâ Àü·«ÀÌ ´ëÇлýµéÀÇ ¿µ¾î ¼ºÃëµµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ ¿¬±¸. ¿µ¾î¿µ¹®Çבּ¸, 38(1), 327-351.
  • Á¤º´»ï. (2011). ¿µ¾îÇнÀÀü·«°ú ÀÚ±âÈ¿´É°¨ÀÌ ´ëÇлý ÅäÀͼºÀû º¯È­¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â Á¾´ÜÀû È¿°ú. ±³À°Æò°¡¿¬±¸, 24(2), 377-399.
  • Â÷°æ¾Ö. (1999). ¿µ¾îÀбⱳÀ°·Ð. ¼­¿ï. Çѱ¹¹®È­»ç.
  • ÀÌ¸í¼±. (2008). µ¶ÇØ Àü·«Áöµµ°¡ °íµîÇб³ ¿µ¾îÇнÀÀÚµéÀÇ Àб⿡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ. ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ±³À°´ëÇпø ¼®»çÇÐÀ§ ³í¹®.
  • ÃÖÀ±Èñ. (2012). Çѱ¹ ¿µ¾î ÇнÀÀÚµéÀÇ ¿µ¾î Àбâ-¾²±â ÅëÇÕÇü °ú¾÷ ¼öÇà¿¡¼­ Àü·« »ç¿ë°ú °ú¾÷ ¼öÇà. ¿µ¾î±³°ú±³À°, 11(3), 87-107.
  • Bahndura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  • Barnett, M. A. (1988). Reading through context: How real and perceived strategy use affects L2 comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 72, 150-160.
  • Block, L. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 464-494.
  • Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.
  • Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). New York: Longman.
  • Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. New York: Longman.
  • Cziko, G. (1980). Language learning: Insights for learners, teachers, and researchers. New York: Heinle & Heinle.
  • Ehrman, M. E., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). Cognition plus: Correlates of language learning success. The Modern Language Journal, 79(1), 67-89.
  • Kanfer, F. H., & Hagerman, S. (1981). The Role of Self-Regulation. In L. P. Rehm (Ed.), Behavior Therapy for Depression (pp. 143-179). New York: Academic.
  • Meyer, W. (1992). Paradoxical effects of praise and blame on perceived ability. European Review of Social Psychology, 3, 259-283.
  • Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students¡¯awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Developmental Education, 25(3), 2-10.
  • Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What very teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.
  • Proctor, C. P., Carlo, M., August, D., & Snow, C. (2005). Native Spanish-speaking children reading in English: Toward a model of comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 246-256.
  • Rubin, J. (1975). What the good language learner can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 41-51.
  • Schunk. D.¡¡H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207-231.
  • Song, M. J. (1999). Reading strategies and second language reading ability: The magnitude of the relationship. English Teaching, 54(3), 73-95.
  • Wang, C. (2004). Self-regulated learning strategies and self-efficacy beliefs of children learning English as a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
  • Wenden, A. (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy. New York: Prentice Hall.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). Homework practices and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-efficacy and perceived responsibility beliefs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(4), 397-417.