대한언어학회 전자저널

Kim, Yul-I & Choe, Mun-Hong. (2018). Reading strategy use: How exactly do second language learners self-reports reflect their actual performance? The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 26(1), 97-117. It has been reported that second language learners proficiency development is associated with their recognition and use of various learning strategies. The present study sets out to examine Korean university students awareness and enactment of L2 English reading strategies with a focus on whether and to what extent their metacognitive awareness and actual use of strategies differ. On the assumption that a triangulated study is necessary to obtain more reliable data, questionnaire surveys, think-aloud tasks, and retrospective interviews were administered to 38 students at different proficiency levels. The results show that there are substantial differences between self-reported awareness measures and actual strategy use as a function of proficiency level. Most notably, intermediate-level students are apparently aware of a wider range of strategies than advanced and lower-level students, but they do not seem to make use of them as effectively as advanced students do. Think-aloud tasks and interviews further affirm that advanced students are capable of using a select set of strategies in a more automatized and personalized way.

# EFL # reading strategies # metacognition # awareness # think-aloud

• 권순옥. (2009). 읽기책략 사용과 메타인지적 의식: 영어전공자와 공학전공자를 중심으로. 한국영어학, 9(1), 61-82.
• 나경희. (2008). 한국 대학생들의 영어독해 전략 활용 및 활용에 따른 독해능력과의 상관관계 분석. 현대영어영문학, 52(2), 91-114.
• 마선미. (2013). The effects of metacognitive approaches on EFL reading: Using a think-aloud strategy with feedbacks. 고려대학교 박사학위 논문.
• 이정원. (2013). A study on English reading strategy use of Korean college students. 인문학연구, 92, 5-26.
• 정지원. (2013). 영어 독해 전략 지도가 학습자 독해 성취도 향상과 메타인지 전략 사용에 미친 영향. 한국외국어교육학, 20(2), 79-104.
• 최숙기. (2010). 읽기 전략에 대한 독자의 상위인지 인식 양상에 관한 연구. 청람어문교육, 41, 313-349.
• 최숙자. (2013). 한국 대학생들의 메타인지 인식 및 영어 독해 전략 사용에 관한 연구. 호서대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문.
• 최숙자, 장선미. (2013). 한국 대학생들의 영어독해에 대한 메타인지 인식과 독해전략 사용에 관한 연구. 영어어문교육, 19(4), 403-426.
• 한미리. (2013). 대학생 영어 독해 성취도와 독해 전략 및 상위인지 간의 상관관계 연구. 숙명여자대학교 교육대학원 석사학위 논문.
• Afflerbach, P. (1990). The influence of prior knowledge and text genre on readers’ prediction strategies. Journal of Literacy Research, 22(2), 131-148.
• Anderson, N. J. (1991). Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing. The Modern Language Journal, 75(4), 460-472.
• Anderson, N. J. (2005). L2 strategy research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 757-772). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Bacon, S. M. (1992). The relationship between gender, comprehension, processing strategies, and cognitive and affective response in foreign language listening. The Modern Language Journal, 76(2), 160-178.
• Baumann, J. F., Seifert-Kessell, N., & Jones, L. A. (1992). Effect of think-aloud instruction on elementary students’ comprehension monitoring abilities. Journal of Literacy Research, 24(2), 143-172.
• Block, E. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 463-494.
• Carrell, P. L. (1989). Metacognitive awareness and second language reading. The Modern Language Journal, 73(2), 121-134.
• Carrell, P. L., Pharis, B. G., & Liberto, J. C. (1989). Metacognitive strategy training for ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 23(4), 647-678.
• Cohen, A. D., & Scott, K. (1996). A synthesis of approaches to assessing language learning strategies (pp. 89-106). R. L. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives. National Foreign Language Resource Center.
• Connor, U. (1987). The eclectic synergy of methods of reading research. J. Devine, P. L. Carrell, & D-E. Eskey (Eds.), Research in reading in English as a second language, pp. 11-20.
• Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87(3), 215.
• Eslinger, C. E. (2000). A more responsive mind: A study of learning strategy adaption among culturally diverse ESL students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University.
• Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906.
• Flavell, J. H. (2004). Theory-of-mind development: Retrospect and prospect. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50, 274-290.
• Rajoo, F. X. A., & Selvaraj, B. (2010). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. In Science and Social Research (CSSR), 2010 International Conference on (pp. 1301-1304). IEEE.
• Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Ablex Publishing.
• Jacobs, J. E., & Paris, S. G. (1987). Children’s metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22(3), 255-278.
• Jennifer, M. Y. (2002). Think-aloud as an instructional tool for developing second language reading. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 165-189.
• Juliebö, M., Malicky, G., & Norman, C. (1998). Metacognition of young readers in an early intervention programme. Journal of Research in Reading, 21(1), 24-35.
• Miholic, V. (1994). An inventory to pique students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Reading, 38(2), 84-86.
• Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students’ awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Developmental Education, 25(3), 2.
• Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249.
• O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
• Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
• Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(3), 293-316.
• Pereira‐Laird, J. A., & Deane, F. P. (1997). Development and validation of a self-report measure of reading strategy use. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 18(3), 185-235.
• Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Rumelhart, D. E. (1994). Toward an interactive model of reading. International Reading Association.
• Schmitt, M. C. (1990). A questionnaire to measure children’s awareness of strategic reading processes. The Reading Teacher, 43(7), 454-461.
• Veenman, M. V., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3-14.
• Wolff, D. (1987). Some assumptions about second language text comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9(3), 307-326.
• Young, D. J. (1993). Processing strategies of foreign language readers: Authentic and edited input. Foreign Language Annals, 26(4), 451-468.