´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ ÀüÀÚÀú³Î

´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ

25±Ç 2È£ (2017³â 6¿ù)

Two types of VP-ellipsis in Korean

ÀÌÁ¤½Ä

Pages : 85-120

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24303/lakdoi.2017.25.2.85

PDFº¸±â

¸®½ºÆ®

Abstract

Lee, Jeong-Shik. (2017). Two types of VP-ellipsis in Korean. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 25(2), 85-120. In this paper, based on some arguments for VP-ellipsis (VPE) in null object constructions in Korean, I propose that VPE be classified into two types: Additive VPE (or To-VPE) and Contrastive VPE (or Nun-VPE). I then show that some perplexing contrasts can be properly accounted for by VPE, but not by NP-ellipsis, Argument-ellipsis, or pro. I also attempt to offer a new account for the appearance of the additive particle -to in Additive VPE and the contrastive particle -nun in Contrastive VPE in terms of a principle of language use, called Maximize Presupposition. VPE thus appears as a common property across languages, particularly, in both English and Korean, and VPE thereby correlates with sloppy readings in general (Huang, 1991).

Keywords

# additive VPE # contrastive VPE # additive -to # contrastive -nun # sloppy reading # Maximize Presupposition # NP-ellipsis # argument ellipsis # pro

References

  • Ahn, H.-D. (2007). The ellipsis of light verbs and lexical semantic structures. Studies in Modern Grammar, 47, 133-162.
  • Ahn, H.-D. (2012). A study on fragments. Seoul: Hankuk Publishing Co.
  • Ahn, H.-D., & Cho, S. (2009). On the absence of CP ellipsis in English and Korean. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 34(2), 267-281.
  • Ahn, H.-D., & Cho, S. (2010). More on the absence of CP ellipsis: A reply to Park (2009). Studies in Generative Grammar, 20(1), 137-148.
  • Ahn, H.-D., & Cho, S. (2012). On some ellipsis phenomena in Korean. In Proceedings of the 14th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar: Three factors and syntactic theory (pp. 3-38).
  • Ahn, S.-H. (2002). The state-event distinction and the light verb construction. Studies in Generative Grammar, 12(2), 441-465.
  • Amsili, P., & Beyssade, C. (2006). Compulsory presupposition in discourse. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Constraints in Discourse.
  • Chung, D. (2009). An elliptical coordination analysis of the right dislocated construction in Korean. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 17(4), 1-23.
  • Chung, T. (1993). Argument structure and serial verbs in Korean. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
  • Funakoshi, K. (2015). Verb-stranding verb phrase ellipsis in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 25(2), 2113-2142.
  • Grimshaw, J., & Mester, A. (1988). Light verbs and theta-marking. Linguistic Inquiry, 19(2), 205-232.
  • Goldberg, L. (2005). Verb-stranding VP-ellipsis: A cross-linguistic study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montreal.
  • Green, G. M. (1968). On too and either, and not just on too and either, either. CLS, 4, 22-39.
  • Heim, I. (1991). Artikel und definitheit. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin: de Gruyter.
  • Hoji, H. (1998). Null objects and sloppy identity in Japanese. Linguistic Inquiry, 29(1), 127-152.
  • Huang, C.-T. J. (1991). Remarks on the status of the null object. In R. Freidin (Ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar (pp. 56-76). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Kaplan, J. (1984). Obligatory too in English. Language, 60(3), 510-518.
  • Kim, J.-S. (1997). Syntactic focus movement and ellipsis: A minimalist approach. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
  • Kim, S. (1999). Sloppy/strict identity, empty objects, and NP-ellipsis. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 8(4), 255-284.
  • Lee, J.-S. (1997). Antecedent-contained deletion constructions in Korean. In Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics VII (pp. 399-413).
  • Lee, J.-S. (2016). Some ellipsis phenomena in Korean. In Proceedings of the 18th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar: Beyond core syntax: A minimalist approach (pp. 298-334).
  • Lee, J.-S. (2017). Rethinking right-dislocation constructions. Studies in Generative Grammar, 27(1), 1-36.
  • Lee, W. (2014). Argumental gaps in Korean. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 22(1), 1-29.
  • Lee, W. (2016). Argument ellipsis vs. verb-stranding VP ellipsis in Korean: Evidence from disjunction. Linguistic Research, 33(1), 1-20.
  • Lobeck, A. (1995). Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing, and identification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Moon, G.-S. (2015). A non-isomorphism approach to null-argument anaphora in Korean. Studies in Generative Grammar, 25(1), 217-236.
  • Nishiyama, K., Whitman, J., & Yi, E.-Y. (1996). Syntactic movement of overt wh-phrases in Japanese and Korean. Proceedings of Japanese/Korean Linguistics, 5, 337-351.
  • Oku, S. (1988). A theory of selection and reconstruction in the minimalist program. Doctoral dissertation. University of Connecticut.
  • Otani, K., & Whitman, J. (1991). V-raising and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry, 22(2), 345-358.
  • Park, K. (1992). Light verb constructions in Korean and Japanese. Doctoral dissertation. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
  • Park, M.-K. (1994). A morpho-syntactic study of Korean verbal inflection. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
  • Park, M.-K. (1997). Absence of tense agreement and VP ellipsis in Korean. In Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics VII (pp. 473-487).
  • Park, M.-K. (2001). Subject-less clefts in Korean: Towards a deletion analysis. Language Research, 37(4), 715-739.
  • Park, M.-K., & Cho, E. (2015). Korean/Japanese vs. Chinese on quantificational/sloppy readings of null objects. Studies in Modern Grammar, 85, 1-28.
  • Park, M.-K., & Kim, S.-W. (2009). The syntax of afterthoughts in Korean: Move and Delete. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 17(4), 25-53.
  • Rooth, M. (1992). A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, 1(1), 75-116.
  • Saito, M. (2007). Notes on East Asian argument ellipsis. Language Research, 43(2), 203-227.
  • Sakamoto, Y. (2014). A phasal approach to argument ellipsis in Japanese and its consequences. In Proceedings of the 14th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
  • Sakamoto, Y. (2016). Phases and argument ellipsis in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 25(3), 243-274.
  • Sauerland, U. (2008). Implicated presuppositions. In A. Steube (Ed.), Sentence and context: language, context, and cognition.
  • Singh, R. (2008). VP-deletion, obligatory too, and focus semantics. Ms. MIT.
  • Takahashi, D. (2008). Noun phrase ellipsis. In S. Miyagawa & M. Saito (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Japanese linguistics (pp. 394-422). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Tanaka, H. (2001). Right-dislocation as scrambling. Journal of Linguistics, 37(3), 551-579.
  • Um, H.-J. (2011). The nature of the null arguments in Korean. Studies in Modern Grammar, 63, 73-93