´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ ÀüÀÚÀú³Î

´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ

29±Ç 2È£ (2021³â 6¿ù)

¿¹Ã¼´É°è¿­ ÇнÀÀÚµéÀÇ ¿µ¾î±Û¾²±â¿Í Çǵå¹é¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀνÄ

Áø¼ÛÈ­

Pages : 115-141

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24303/lakdoi.2021.29.2.115

PDFº¸±â

¸®½ºÆ®

Abstract

Jin, Songhwa. (2021). Perceptions of English writing and feedback from students majoring in arts and physical education. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 29(2), 115-141. The purpose of this study was to find out the perceptions of English writing and feedback from college students majoring in arts and physical education. Students received feedback on their English writing three times: once from their teacher and twice from their peers. The students were asked to correct their writing after receiving the feedback. The findings were as follows: First, the learners were not interested and confident in English writing, but they recognized the need to write in English. Second, learners wanted to write English reports or resumes that would help them get a job in the future. Third, as the need for writing increased, learners showed different aspects in their preferences for the types of writing class activities. Finally, the learners recognized the importance of feedback from both their peers and their teacher. According to the survey, the learners answered that the teacher feedback was more helpful than the peer feedback.

Keywords

# ¿µ¾î ±Û¾²±â(English writing) # ´ëÇпµ¾î(college English) # Çǵå¹é(feedback) # ÀνÄ(perceptions) # ¿¹Ã¼´É°è¿­ Àü°ø(arts and physical education majors)

References

  • ±è¸íÁÖ. (2005). ±â°í: ´ëÇÐ ±³¾ç¿µ¾î °³¼± ¹æÇâ. ±³¼ö½Å¹®, 5¿ù 15ÀÏ 2005³â, http://www.kyosu.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=7611
  • ±è¿¬Èñ. (2015). ±³»ç Çǵå¹é°ú µ¿·á Çǵå¹éÀÌ ÇлýµéÀÇ ÀÛ¹® ¼öÁ¤°ú Çâ»ó¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ ºñ±³. ¿µ¾î¿µ¹®ÇÐ ¿¬±¸, 57(3), 59-79.
  • ±è¿µÀÚ. (2013). ±³»ç/µ¿·á Çǵå¹éÀÌ ¿µ¾î¾²±â¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇнÀÀÚ ÀνĿ¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ: ¾²±â ¼öÁغ° ºÐ¼®. ¿µ¾î¿µ¹®ÇÐ, 18(1), 177-205.
  • ±èÁö³ª, Áø¼ÛÈ­. (2015). ÃÊµî ¿µÀçµéÀ» À§ÇÑ ¿µ¾î ±Û¾²±â Áöµµ¿Í È¿°úÀûÀΠ÷»è ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »ç·Ê¿¬±¸. ¾ð¾îÇÐ, 23(3), 153-171.
  • ±èÁöÀº, À¯È£. (2014). Ư¼ö¸ñÀû ¿µ¾î(ESP)·Î¼­ÀÇ ½ºÆ÷Ã÷ ¿µ¾î±³À°: ½ºÆ÷Ã÷°ü·Ã ºÐ¾ß ÇлýµéÀÇ ÀÚ±âÀνÄÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î. Çѱ¹ÄÜÅÙÃ÷ÇÐȸ³í¹®Áö, 14(11), 509-517.
  • ±èÁøÈñ. (2016). ¿¹¼ú°è¿­ ´ëÇлýÀÇ ±Û¾²±â ¼ö¾÷»ç·Ê ¿¬±¸: ÀÛ¾÷ÀÏÁö¸¦ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î. ±³¾ç±³À°¿¬±¸, 10(4), 181-208.
  • ¹®Áö¼ø, À¯¼ºÈ£. (2017). ¿¹Ã¼´É °è¿­ ¿µ¾î±³À°ÀÇ Çʿ伺°ú È¿°ú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸. Ä¿¹Â´ÏÄÉÀ̼ǵðÀÚÀבּ¸, 60, 143-151.
  • ¹ÎÂù±Ô, ±èº¸°æ. (2006). Çùµ¿ÇнÀÀ» È°¿ëÇÑ °íµîÇб³ ¿µ¾î ¾²±â Áöµµ È¿°ú. ¿µ¾î¿µ¹®±³À°, 12(4), 186-210.
  • ¹Ú¹Ì°æ. (2020). ¼Ò±×·ì Çù·Â¾²±â¿Í °úÁ¤Á᫐ Çǵå¹éÀ» ÅëÇÑ ±³¾ç¿µ¾î ¾²±â¼ö¾÷ ¹æ¾È ¿¬±¸. ±³¾ç±³À°¿¬±¸, 14(2), 159-174.
  • ¹ÚºÎ³². (2018). ¿¹¼ú´ëÇÐ ¿µ¾î ÇнÀ¸ðÇü °³¹ß ±âÃÊ¿¬±¸: ¿ä±¸ºÐ¼®°ú ÇнÀµ¿±â¸¦ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î. ¿­¸°±³À°¿¬±¸, 26(3), 131-158.
  • ¹ÚºÎ³². (2020). ¿¹¼úÇ÷§ÆûÀ» È°¿ëÇÑ ¿¹¼ú¿µ¾î ÅëÇÕ ¼ö¾÷ ¸ðÇü °³¹ß°ú Àû¿ë. ¿­¸°±³À°¿¬±¸, 28(2), 293-319.
  • ¹Ú¼ÒÀº. (2013). Çѱ¹ ÇлýµéÀÇ ¿µÀÛ¹® ºÒ¾È°ú ¿µÀÛ¹® Àü·« »ç¿ë ¿¬±¸. ÀüÁÖ´ëÇб³ ±³À°´ëÇпø ¼®»çÇÐÀ§³í¹®.
  • º¯ÁöÇö. (2014). ¿µÀÛ¹® ¼ö¾÷¿¡¼­ ±³»ç Çǵå¹é¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇнÀÀÚ ÀÎ½Ä ¹× ¹ÝÀÀÁ¶»ç. ¾ð¾îÇבּ¸, 19(6), 27-51.
  • ¼º±Íº¹. (2018). ¸ð¹ÙÀϾÛÀ» È°¿ëÇÑ ´ëÇлýµéÀÇ ¿µ¹® µ¿·áÇǵå¹é È°µ¿ ¿¬±¸. ÇнÀÀÚÁ߽ɱ³°ú±³À° ¿¬±¸, 18(8), 539-570.
  • ½Å¿µÇå. (2018). ´ëÇлýÀÇ ¿µ¾î ±Û¾²±â ´É·Â Çâ»óÀ» À§ÇÑ ±³¾ç¿µ¾î¼ö¾÷ ¿¬±¸. ±³¾ç±³À°¿¬±¸, 12(4), 37-56.
  • ¿øÁÖ¿¬, ¼º±Íº¹. (2017). ¸ð¹ÙÀÏ ¾Û ±â¹ÝÀÇ ¿µ¾î ¾îÈÖ È°µ¿¿¡ ³ªÅ¸³­ µ¿·á Çǵå¹é ¾ç»ó ¿¬±¸. ¿Ü±¹Çבּ¸, 39, 87-119.
  • À̽ÂÀº, ±è°æÈÆ. (2018). ¿µ¾î ¾²±â È°µ¿ÀÌ ¿µ¾î ´É·ÂÇâ»ó¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â È¿°ú¿Í ¾²±â Çǵå¹é¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇнÀÀÚµéÀÇ Åµµ. Àι®»çȸ 21, 9(5)
  • À̽ÂÀº, Á¶¿í»ó. (2019). üÀ°Æ¯±âÀÚ ´ëÇлýÀ» À§ÇÑ ¿µ¾î: ¿ä±¸ ºÐ¼®°ú º¯ÀεéÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è. ¿µ¾î±³°ú±³À°, 18(1), 117-141.
  • ÀÌÁö¿¬. (2010). Çѱ¹ ´ëÇлýµéÀÇ ¿µÀÛ¹® È°µ¿ ½Ã ³ªÅ¸³ª´Â µ¿·áÇǵå¹éÀÇ ¾ç»ó ¹× ÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀνÄ. Çö´ë¿µ¾î±³À°, 11(3), 134-161.
  • ÀÌÈñ¿¬, ³ë½Âö. (2013). °í±ÞÅë°èºÐ¼®·Ð: À̷аú ½Ç½À. °æ±âµµ °í¾ç: ¹®¿ì»ç.
  • Á¤¾ç¼ö. (2010). »çÀ̹ö Ä·ÆÛ½º ±â¹ÝÀÇ ±³¾ç¿µ¾î¼ö¾÷¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¸¸Á·µµ ¹× °³¼±¹æ¾È ¿¬±¸. ¾ð¾î¿¬±¸, 26(1), 149-174.
  • Á¤¾ç¼ö. (2012). ¿µ¾î¾²±â °úÁ¤¿¡¼­ Á¦°øµÇ´Â Çǵå¹éÀÇ À¯Çü°ú Á¦°ø¹æ¹ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇнÀÀÚÀÇ ¿ä±¸ ºÐ¼®. Çö´ë¿µ¹Ì¾î¹®ÇÐ, 30(1), 31-56.
  • Á¤¿µÃ¶. (2014). ÅëÇÕÀû Á¢±Ù: ¿µ°Å ±Û¾²±â ¼ö¾÷¿¡¼­ÀÇ Çǵå¹éÁֱ⠹æ½Ä¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ´ëÇлýµéÀÇ ÀνÄ. Çö´ë¿µ¹Ì¾î¹®ÇÐ, 32(1), 79-101.
  • Á¶ÀºÇü. (2018). Çùµ¿ÇнÀÀ» ÅëÇÑ ¿µ¾î ¾²±â È°µ¿ÀÌ ÇнÀÀÚÀÇ ¿µÀÛ¹® ºÒ¾È°ú ¿µ¾îÇнÀ °£Á¢ Àü·«¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â È¿°ú, ¿µ¾î±³°ú±³À°, 17(1), 127-146.
  • ÁÖ¹ÌÁø. (2012). Rasch ÃøÁ¤ ¸ðÇüÀ» ÅëÇØ Á÷Á¢ Çǵå¹é, °£Á¢ Çǵå¹éÀÌ Çѱ¹ ´ëÇлý ¿µ¾îÀÛ¹® Çâ»ó¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ Á¶»ç. ¿µ¾î±³À°¿¬±¸, 24(4), 277-295.
  • ŹÁø¿µ. (2012). ¾²±â¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Àǽĵµ ¹× ¾²±â Á᫐ ±³¾ç¿µ¾î ¼ö¾÷ÀÇ ¹æ¹ý¡¤¸¸Á·µµ Á¶»ç: ¿µ¾î ¿ø¾î¹Î ±³¼ö¿Í Çѱ¹ÀÎ ¿µ¾î ºñ¿ø¾î¹Î ±³¼ö ¼ö¾÷À» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î. ¿µ¹Ì¾î¹®ÇÐ, 105, 323-249.
  • ÇÑÇм±. (2017). ¹®¹ý±â¹Ý ¿µ¾î¾²±â ¼ö¾÷À» À§ÇÑ ±³¼ö¹ý°ú ÇнÀÀÚ º¯Àο¡ ´ëÇÑ °íÂû. ±³¾ç±³À°¿¬±¸, 11(5). 409-447.
  • Brown, H. D. (1994). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
  • Byrne, D. (1988). Teaching writing skills. London: Longman.
  • Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Langage Writing, 12, 267-296.
  • Chang, C, F. (2012). Peer review via three modes in an EFL writing course. Computers and Composition, 29(1), 63-78.
  • Chin, C.-S. (2007). EFL learners¡¯perceptions on English writing tasks and teacher feedback. English Language & Literature Teaching, 13(1), 1-26.
  • Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding second language acquisition. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Hedgcock, J., & N. Lefkowitz. (1996). Some input on Input: Two Analyses of Student Response to Expert Feedback in L2 Writing. The Modern Language Journal, 80(3), 287-308.
  • Munice, J. (2000). Using written teacher feedback in EFL composition classes. ELT Journal, 54(1), 47-53.
  • Narciss, S. (2008). Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. van Merrienboer, & M. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 125-144). Mahaw, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Peterson, R. A. (1994). A meta-analysis of Cronbach¡¯s alpha. The Journal of Comsumer Research, 21, 381-391.
  • Saito, H. (1994). Teacher¡¯s practices and students¡¯s preferences for feedback on second language writing: A case study of adult ESL learners. TESL Canada Journal. 11(2), 46-70.
  • Truscott, J., & Hsu, A. (2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 292-305.
  • Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M. (2000). Does secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), 147-170.
  • Zamel, V. (1982). Writing: The process of discovering meaning. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 195-209.
  • Zhu, W. (2001). Interaction and feedback in mixed peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 251-276.