´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ ÀüÀÚÀú³Î

´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ

26±Ç 4È£ (2018³â 12¿ù)

L1 Interference in Koreans' Perception of Released Word-final Stops in English

Hyunsook Kang

Pages : 1-20

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24303/lakdoi.2018.26.4.1

PDFº¸±â

¸®½ºÆ®

Abstract

Kang, Hyunsook. (2018). L1 interference in Koreans' perception of released word-final stops in English. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 26(4), 1-20. This study investigated L1 interference in the perception of released word-final stops in English by performing perception experiments on Korean and English listeners. Stimuli with conflicting cues were used in experiments in which the long CV and the short vowel CV were rejoined with six silent closure duration intervals and two release bursts of [g] and two release bursts of [k]. The perception results show that Korean listeners perceived significantly more [k] compared to English listeners when k release was attached to a long CV. We suggest that this is due to different phonological systems in Korean and English. In Korean, a released stop occurs only in the onset position in which the VOT and the stop closure duration are important acoustic cues for the identity of a stop. Thus, the English coda [k] with voiceless release burst could be perceived as an onset with long VOT, namely [k], by Korean listeners. In contrast, English listeners mostly perceived a voiced stop due to the long preceding vowel (cf. Raphael, 1972). With the stimuli of short CV with g release, Korean listeners perceived significantly more [g] than NE listeners did. English coda [g] with a voiced release may be perceived as an onset [g] with a short VOT by Korean listeners. In contrast, English listeners perceived a voiceless stop [k] due to the preceding short vowel. This paper also showed that Korean listeners would perceive finer distinctions than two levels of release, g release and k release.

Keywords

# L1 interference # perception # released word-final stops in English # conflicting cues # release bursts

References

  • Best, C., McRoberts, G., & Sithole, N. (1988). The phonological basis of perceptual loss for non-native contrasts: Maintenance of discrimination among Zulu clicks by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 345-360.
  • Burnham, D. (1986). Developmental loss of speech perception: Exposure to and experience with a first language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 7, 207–240.
  • Byrd, D. (1993). 54,000 American stops. UCLA working Papers in Phonetics, 83, 97-116.
  • Crowther, C., & Mann, V. (1992). Native language factors affecting use of vocalic cues to final consonant voicing in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 711-722.
  • Goto, H. (1971). Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds ¡°L¡± and ¡°R¡±. Neuropsychologia, 9, 317-323.
  • Han, J. (1996). The phonetics and phonology of ¡°tense¡± and ¡°plain¡± consonants in Korean. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, NY.
  • Han, M., & Weitzman, R. (1970). Acoustic features of Korean /P, T, K/, /p, t, k/, /ph, th, kh/. Phonetica, 22, 112-128.
  • Hillenbrand, J., Ingrisano, D., Smith, B., & Flege, J. (1984). Perception of the voiced-voiceless contrast in syllable-final stops. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 18-26.
  • Hogan, J., & Rozsypal, A. (1980). Evaluation of vowel duration as a cue for the voicing distinction in the following word-final consonant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67, 1764-1771.
  • Jun, S.-A. (1993). The phonetics and phonology of Korean prosody. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
  • Kang, H., & Yoon, K. (2005). Tense/lax distinctions of English [s] in intervocalic position by Korean speakers: consonant/vowel ratio as a possible universal cue for consonant distinctions. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology, 11, 407-419.
  • Kim, C.-W. (1970). A theory of aspiration. Phonetica, 21, 107-116.
  • Liberman, A., Delattre, P., & Cooper, F. (1958). Some cues for the distinction between voiced and voiceless stops in initial position. Language and Speech, 1, 153-167.
  • Lisker, L. (1981). On generalizing the Rapid-Rabid distinction based on silent gap duration. Haskins Laboratories Status Reports on Speech Research, SR-54. 127-132.
  • Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. (1964). Cross-language study of voicing in initial stops; acoustical measurements. Word, 20, 384-422.
  • Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. (1970). The voicing dimension: Some experiments in comparative phonetics. In Proceedings of the sixth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 563-567.
  • Park, H., & Kang, S. (2006). A cross-lingusitic study of the perception of the voicing contrast in English plosives. Eoneohak, 45, 3-37.
  • Port, R. & Dalby, J. (1982). Consonant/vowel ratio as cue for voicing in English. Perception and Psychophysics, 32, 141-152.
  • Raphael, L. (1972). Preceding vowel duration as a cue to the perception of the voicing characteristic of word-final consonants in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51, 1296-1303.
  • Raphael, L. (1981). Duration and contexts as cues to word-final cognate opposition in English. Phonetica, 38, 126-147.
  • Silva, D. (1992). The phonetics and phonology of stop lenition in Korean. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, NY.
  • Silva, D. (2006). Variation in voice onset time for Korean stops: A case for recent sound change. Korean Linguistics, 13, 1-16.
  • Whalen, D. (1984). Subcategorical phonetic mismatches slow phonetic judgments. Perception and Psychophysics, 35, 49-64.